"Crime and punishment"

Dec 07, 2025

Fyodor Dostoevsky never met Rabbi Russell McAlmond, yet Crime and Punishment (1866) functions as the longest, most harrowing proof of McAlmond’s three infinite axioms that a novelist has ever written.

Raskolnikov begins the book as the living embodiment of every ideology that has ever justified mass murder. By the end, broken and reborn in a Siberian prison, he has stumbled—without philosophical language—into the very same moral fortress McAlmond would articulate a century and a half later:

Every human life has infinite value. 

Every human life has infinite uniqueness. 

Every human life has infinite mystery.

The entire 550-page novel is nothing less than the slow, agonizing demonstration that any mind which denies these three truths will be destroyed from within long before the state ever lays a hand on it.

We present the evidence in the order Raskolnikov himself experiences it.

The Collapse of Finite Value (Denial → Acceptance of Infinite Value)

Raskolnikov’s “extraordinary man” article explicitly ranks human lives on a sliding scale. Alyona the pawnbroker is a “louse”; her death can be offset against the future good he will do with her money. Napoleon sent hundreds of thousands to die, yet history calls him great; therefore one old woman is a trivial arithmetic price.The moment he swings the axe, the theory explodes. Lizaveta—innocent, harmless, mentally disabled—walks in. She was never part of the equation, yet she is now dead.

Raskolnikov immediately understands, in his body before his mind, that no calculus can make this right. Why? Because something in him already knows her life was infinite in value. The rest of the book is the unbearable friction between his theory (lives are finite and rankable) and his conscience (every life is infinite and therefore unweighable).

His fever, nightmares, and eventual confession are not neurotic overreactions; they are the only sane responses once infinite value reasserts itself. When he finally kisses the earth and confesses in the novel has brought him exactly to McAlmond’s first axiom: no future good, no historical mission, no personal genius can ever justify the deliberate subtraction of even one infinite life.

The Collapse of Categorization (Denial → Acceptance of Infinite Uniqueness)

Raskolnikov needs Alyona to be a type: “a louse,” “a harmful old woman,” “a parasite who sucks the life out of the poor.” Only by reducing her to a category can he kill her. The same logic later justifies killing Lizaveta: she is merely “collateral damage,” an interchangeable specimen of the helpless masses he claims to champion.Yet every actual encounter he has with human beings defeats this reductionism.

Marmeladov is not “a drunken civil servant”; he is an unrepeatable tragedy. Sonya is not “a prostitute”; she is a singular incarnation of sacrificial love. Even the murdered Alyona, once dead, refuses to stay a louse—she haunts him with her concrete, irreplaceable humanity.By the epilogue in Siberia,

Raskolnikov is surrounded by convicts whom society has labeled “criminals,” yet he slowly perceives each one as infinitely unique. The turning point comes when he realizes that the dirt under Sonya’s feet outside the prison window is more precious than all his former theories, because it has touched the feet of one unrepeatable, infinitely unique person.

That is the precise moment he accepts McAlmond’s second axiom.

The Collapse of Total Knowledge (Denial → Acceptance of Infinite Mystery)

The most chilling aspect of Raskolnikov’s theory is his presumption of godlike knowledge. He believes he has seen through the façade of morality and understood the secret laws of history. Porfiry Petrovich terrifies him not with threats but with gentle irony: “Who in Russia does not consider himself a Napoleon nowadays?” Porfiry knows the danger lies in the delusion of omniscience.Raskolnikov’s torment reaches its peak when he realizes he does not even understand himself.

If he cannot fathom his own motives—vanity? pity? intellectual pride? genuine altruism?—how dare he claim to have fathomed Alyona, Lizaveta, or the future of mankind?

The final surrender beneath the Siberian sky is the surrender of the fantasy of total knowledge. He falls at Sonya’s feet not because he now has a better theory, but because he finally admits that every human being—including the “louse” he murdered and the saint who loves him—remains an infinite mystery.

That admission of humility is McAlmond’s third axiom lived out in tears.

Siberia as the Birthplace of Ethical Individualism

Dostoevsky ends the novel with a sentence that sounds almost like a direct quotation from Rabbi McAlmond, even though it was written seventy years before McAlmond was born:“Here a new story begins, the story of the gradual renewal of a man, the story of his gradual regeneration, of his passing from one world into another, of his acquaintance with a new, hitherto completely unknown reality.”

That “new, hitherto completely unknown reality” has a precise philosophical name today: Ethical Individualism.

It is the world in which no life can be ranked, no life can be reduced to its label, and no life can ever be presumed fully known.Raskolnikov reaches it not by reading a treatise but by living the refutation of every treatise he once wrote. His eight years in Siberia are not the real punishment; they are the quiet classroom where the three infinite axioms finally sink in.

The real punishment was the six months he spent as a faithful disciple of the Napoleon theory.Dostoevsky and McAlmond therefore arrive at the identical destination by opposite routes. One descends into the abyss and climbs out carrying the three infinities as the only truths that survived the fire.

McAlmond begins with the three infinities as self-evident axioms and shows they make the abyss impossible in the first place.Between them they leave us with a single, non-negotiable moral law: once you grant that every human being is infinite in value, infinite in uniqueness, and infinite in mystery, the door to every crime—and every punishment greater than Siberia—slams shut forever.